|
|
Save Passamaquoddy Bay - Canada
|
Nulankeyutomonen Nkihtahkomikumon - Passamaquoddy |
|
Save Passamaquoddy Bay - US |
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2008
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2007
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2006
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2005
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2003 2004
|
31 August 2006 |
Several KeySpan officials were available to answer questions during the tour, but councilors who attended weren't completely satisfied with the substance of the responses they received.
30 August 2006 |
28 August 2006 |
Quoddy Bay LNG so far has not made any lease payments to the tribe.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Don Smith's video-recorded statements at a 2005 Sipayik Tribal Council meeting claimed that his LNG project would have no negative effect on fishing that the LNG vessel's pilot would radio any fishing boat within the LNG vessel's safety/security zone that the pilot recognized; then, if the fisherman answered the pilot's questions to the pilot's satisfaction, the fisherman would be allowed to keep on fishing in the safety/security zone.The Coast Guard's notice of authority is testimony to just one more of Smith's lies.
Smith's false claim was even adamantly repeated by a local harbor pilot during the 2006 July 13 FERC Quoddy Bay LLC Site Visit, confirming that local pilots have been hoodwinked by Smiths' lack of honesty.
Once again, Quoddy Bay LLC has proven their lack of character, and that they'll say anything at all to obtain public support for their project.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: One of the uses that the Navy cites as prohibited from tidal and submerged lands around their Cutler base, as a matter of Department of Defense policy, is extracting energy. Mr. Laberge objects to this webmaster's previous conclusion regarding Laberge's proposed dam at Cutler, "It appears that this project is, essentially, dead." Laberge categorized this webmaster's conclusion as exhibiting "arrogance" and "intransigence." Since this webmaster simply iterated the obvious, Mr. Laberge should, instead, redirect his objection to the Department of Defense. It is that body who established the prohibition of his project around naval installations.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Is anyone else noticing the similarity between what is happening at this location and what happened at the Gleason Cove location? Quoddy Bay LNG previously proposed to put their project at Gleason Cove, and at the same time the Tribe had earmarked the site for a housing project. History is repeating itself.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Quoddy Bay LNG's "poise" has resulted in an embarrassing "stumble." Since the above article was published, FERC has notified Quoddy Bay LNG that their Resource Reports contain an abundance of missing and incomplete material, pushing back the date that they can file for an application until November, December, or later, making their project even more futile.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Having the executive director for an LNG-industry advocacy group tell the public that LNG terminals are "thoroughly studied" hardly justifies confidence regarding industry-friendly FERC and the LNG siting process.
26 August 2006 |
This amount is expected to be supplemented by an additional $500,000 annually which will be contributed to training and environment protection, and community projects. [Bold emphasis added.] (Jul 26)
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Compare the AES Ocean LNG project with Downeast LNG and Quoddy Bay LLC.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: A person doesn't need to be a rocket scientist to realize that LNG facilities aren't as "safely operated" as FERC and LNG developers hype to the public.
There are federal rules but state officials are in charge.
Fay says all of them should be moved off shore.
"The solution is very clear. The cost of replacing the obsolete terminals with new ones offshore is negligible compared to the damage that might happen," said Fay. [Bold emphasis added.] (Aug 23)
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: The European Union is worried about Russia and Algeria forming a natural gas cartel, while the U.S. Government blithely invites Russia to own and control U.S. natural gas infrastructure. Hasn't the U.S. Government learned anything from history?
24 August 2006 |
Shanna Ratner, President of Yellow Wood Associates in St. Albans, Vt., points out Quoddy Bay LLC Project Manager Brian Smith's lack of knowledge, lack of honesty, and lack of competence as demonstrated in his previous letter to the editor. [NOTE: The Bangor Daily News online letters page contains no link to take you directly to a particular letter. To find the letter using the above link, search the page for "Yellow Wood responds".]WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: FERC personnel must be embarrassed that they are required to deal with Quoddy Bay LLC's project. Hopefully, if Quoddy Bay LLC ever formally applies for a permit, FERC will unceremoniously reject them.
Authorities were especially displeased with the five-day lag between the Aug. 16 security breach and when KeySpan Corp. reported it to the state on Monday, said Mike Coelho, chief of staff of the state Executive Office of Public Safety. [See "LNG attack could ignite firestorm," below.] (Aug 23)
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Note: the emergency response personnel of the Lynn area have been trained to deal with an LNG "event," but the Revere Fire Chief still categorizes what could happen as a "firestorm."
This event should raise the hackles on everyones' necks, for two reasons: (1) It took five days for Keyspan to report the incident; and, (2) although it might have been committed by juveniles, terrorists could have been conducting a "practice run."
It begs the question: "With such a serious breach in security terrorists could have easily created a disaster how can the public believe FERC and LNG developers when they tell the public that new LNG facilities will be operated safely?"
23 August 2006 |
The reality is, Donald Smith failed" last week, said [Vera] Francis, a spokeswoman for the opposition group Nulankeyutomonen Nkihtahkomikumon, or "We Take Care of the Land" in the Passamaquoddy language.WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Don Smith is making a habit of offering money just before elections.
Houlton native Robert Somerville, a graduate of Maine Maritime Academy, now chairman and CEO of the American Bureau of Shipping, fully understands Maine's economic development needs and is well qualified indeed to suggest that the benefits for Maine of assuming its natural role as one of the nation's most important energy transshipment points outweigh by far some mis-perceived risks. [NOTE: The Banfor Daily News online letters page contains no link to take you directly to a particular letter. To find the letter using the above link, search the page for "Maine's energy role".]
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Robert Somerville apparently failed to read the Whole Bay Study and the LNG industry's world standards.
The Whole Bay Study does a more objective job of "understanding Maine's economic development needs" than a spokesman-advocate for the shipping industry.
The Society of International Gas Terminal and Tanker Operators (SIGTTO, with over 90% of the world's LNG capacity as members) has developed LNG-industry world-class standards that warn against siting an LNG terminal under the conditions in Passamaquoddy Bay. Somerville's and the letter writer's "mis-perceived risks" apparently are real-world risks in the eyes of the LNG industry's standards-making body.
22 August 2006 |
Woodcock was the most outright supporter. Merrill said she believed that the siting of LNG should not be a federal issue. LaMarche spoke adamantly against bringing LNG to Maine. (Aug 21)
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: The glut of LNG projects has caused BP to back out of the Pelican Island project. That's one more LNG-industry member that's indicated an over-abundance of LNG projects, even more proof that Downeast LNG and Quoddy Bay LLC are moot or otherwise doomed to financial failure.
The company cited changing market conditions as the reason for the pull-back. [Bold emphasis added.]
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: The 40 LNG terminal applications before FERC has convinced this mega-corp that they wouldn't make money on the project. This demonstrates that the Downeast LNG and Quoddy Bay LLC projects are dead ducks.
20 August 2006 |
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: This situation looks similar to the previous iteration of Quoddy Bay LLC's LNG project, where the selected Gleason Cove site at Pleasant Point was also scheduled to have homes built upon it. Those homes have been put in place, and Quoddy Bay LLC looked for another location for its proposed project.Quoddy Bay LLC's project moved. Quoddy Bay LLC may need to begin seaching for a new home.
Now, land on which Quoddy Bay LLC has a defective lease (due to the Bureau of Indian Affairs violation of federal statute in approving the lease) is being used for another purpose. Is history repeating itself?
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Somerville obviously didn't read the Harpswell Yellow Wood Report. If he had, he'd have known that an LNG terminal at Harpswell would have resulted in a net loss of revenue and jobs.
The next governor faces a steep climb to meet a legislative requirement of having 4 percent of the state's energy from renewable sources by 2009.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Head Harbour Passage parallels the sovereignty issues in the Canadian Arctic. The LNG issue in Passamaquoddy Bay may become the test case for Canada's sovereignty over its Arctic waters.
Excelerate Energy hopes for project approval by year’s end. Start-up would occur in 2007. (Aug 16)
Excelerate may maximize profits by holding onto LNG cargo. (Aug 17)
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Excelerate will need to be careful not to artificially influence natural gas prices by holding out on selling the product. BP is currently under criminal charges for that type of activity last winter.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: FERC says all LNG facilities including those operated by BP will be operated safely. But, FERC doesn't concern itself with an LNG company's history or character. How does neglecting maintenance ensure safe operation?
Managers of three state agencies also believe they are being edged out.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS:This situation poses a real quandry for "super patriots" who believe that Americans should support LNG, no matter what.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Since one of the partners in the current pipeline project deal is BP, the desire by Governor Murkowski's challengers and the legislature to change partners in the deal indicates that at least those people unlike FERC recognize that BP is an inappropriate company to do business with.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Offshore LNG terminals are regulated by the U.S. Coast Guard, rather than FERC. Also, the state has the authority to reject offshore LNG terminals, even though FERC has preeminent authority (with the exceptions of air and water pollution issues, and coastal zone management issues) regarding LNG terminals on a state's actual shores.
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Insurers apparently aren't as confident as LNG developers and industry spokesmen that LNG's shipping record will remain as uneventful as it has been in the past.
15 August 2006 |
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: Make your reservations today!
WEBMASTER'S COMMENTS: This technology blows away Downeast LNG's Dean Girdis's claims that LNG facilities need protected harbors like Passamaquoddy Bay.