|
|
Save Passamaquoddy Bay - Canada
|
Nulankeyutomonen Nkihtahkomikumon - Passamaquoddy |
|
Save Passamaquoddy Bay - US |
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2008
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2007
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2006
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2005
|
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|
2003 2004
|
29 February 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: This new pipeline route has the same probability of happening as the previous five alternatives. Without an LNG terminal, there will be no pipeline.
Webmaster's Comments: Yet another industry source indicates that Downeast LNG, Quoddy Bay LNG, and Calais LNG Import Co. are moot.
28 February 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: Since it was disclosed at last July's Board of Environmental Protection (BEP) hearings that a two-year lobster study is required, it will be interesting to see how Dean Girdis and company can provide the BEP with that study in less than a year.
Girdis promises to be all things to all people now, even to Canadians. In spite of his previous Canada-bashing, he's now promising to hire New Brunswickers not Mainers, and certainly not Texans to build his project's pier.
Having discovered that nothing else works, Girdis apparently wants to believe that this new tactic can overcome Canada's well-founded objections regarding his innately inappropriate project.
A company that wants to build a liquefied natural gas terminal in eastern Baltimore County hasn't adequately addressed security concerns about importing LNG into the area, a U.S. Coast Guard report concluded yesterday. [Red emphasis added.] (Feb 27)
Webmaster's Comments: The same admirable quality of leadership cannot be identified with Maine's congressional delegation on this issue Sen. Olympia Snowe, Sen. Susan Collins, Cong. Mike Michaud, and Cong. Tom Allen. They're more interested in sitting on the fence, not answering our questions for nearly 700 days, now, regarding their positions on the proposed Passamaquoddy Bay LNG projects.
On the other hand, here are some States whose congressional delegates have shows leadership in this regard:
- Massachusetts
- Maryland
- Oregon
Webmaster's Comments: This is another indication of too much LNG import infrastructure in the marketplace.
27 February 2008 |
Tests being done with an empty LNG tanker are expected to last several days.
Webmaster's Comments: Another LNG industry member with a terminal already in construction is indicating that there's already too much LNG capacity!
The credibility of Dean Girdis and Rob Wyatt (Downeast LNG); of Don and Brian Smith (Quoddy Bay LNG); and of Ian Emery, Arthur Gelber, Carl Myers, and James Lewis (Calais LNG Import Co.) has sunk so low, it's now digging a hole. Are their investors paying attention?
22 February 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: Algonquin Pipeline's limit on the amount of nitrogen* in the natural gas injected into the pipeline had been challenged by Statoil Natural Gas, an LNG importer at the Cove Point LNG terminal in Maryland. Statoil and BP had claimed that limiting the amount of nitrogen would significantly reduce the amount of LNG that could be imported into the US.
This is more evidence that LNG importers want to bring "hotter" (higher burning temperature, and more explosive‡) LNG into the US, and then dilute it with nitrogen. (See LNG importers challenge Algonquin Pipeline nitrogen limit on LNG Law Blog.)
FERC does not limit the hotness of LNG being imported into the US; however, it does regulate the hotness of the revaporized LNG being injected into the pipeline; the gas must meet the pipeline's tarrif, so that the pipeline customers' appliances can burn the gas safely. This also means that an LNG terminal must be permitted to deal with the hot LNG being imported, either by removing the hot hydrocarbons, or by diluting with nitrogen. (An existing LNG terminal could receive additional permits from FERC to process "hot" LNG.)
For more about hot LNG and industry philosophy and practices regarding it, see New process to help terminals handle rich LNG on Oil & Gas Journal.
* Nitrogen is "inert"; it won't burn.
‡ Other hydrocarbons (such as ethane, propane, butane, and others) naturally occur in varying amounts in natural gas mined around the world. These other hydrocarbons burn more aggressively than pure methane, and may be explosive when unconfined. "Hotness" refers to the burning temperature (Btu) of a natural gas mixture, as compared with pure methane gas. The more non-methane hydrocarbons in the gas mixture, the "hotter" the gas.
Webmaster's Comments: NorthernStar is claiming that needlessly pitting neighbors against each other over LNG terminal siting, instead of planning where the terminals actually need to be if needed at all "has served the nation well." If you or I were to go to the bank to get a business loan, using this same reasoning, we'd be sent home, empty handed.
21 February 2008 |
20 February 2008 |
"If they don’t have an LNG terminal, the pipeline issue is moot."
Webmaster's Comments: …and they don't have and won't have an LNG terminal. Their new pipeline route doesn't solve their terminal project's inherent violations of the LNG industry's own safety standards (see SIGTTO).
The new pipeline route is the sixth proposed route put foward by Downeast LNG…
Webmaster's Comments: Meanwhile, Downeast LNG can't solve their terminal problems.
Please note that comments for this NOI [Notice of Intent] are requested by March 14, 2008.
Webmaster's Comments: This Notice of Intent is a supplement to the original Notice of Intent published away back on 2006 March 13. There have been other subsequent supplemental notices related to this project.
While there is an "intent" to prepare and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), FERC must actually first prepare a Draft EIS (DEIS), and to do that they must include a completed Coast Guard Waterway Suitability Report (WSR). The WSR cannot be completed, since it requires Canada's cooperation, and Canada will not provide the information. (Canada's opposition to LNG in Passamaquoddy Bay is perfectly consistent with SIGTTO world-class LNG standards.)
No WSR, no DEIS, no EIS, no pipeline, and no terminal. Downeast LNG is wasting everyone's time and money.
Webmaster's Comments: The Northeast Gateway LNG terminal is about to receive its first LNG cargo. That project, along with the Suez terminal off Gloucester, Massachusetts, that will be completed around the end of 2009, and the Canaport LNG terminal in Saint John, New Brunswick, that will be receiving LNG around the end of 2008, according to LNG industry experts, will satisfy the need for natural gas in northern New England.
Opposition … centered on commercial issues.
"Right now, we don't have adequate markets for the (natural gas) supply we have past 2009," Clark said. "If we shut down the LNG plant, there is no need for our supply. [Red emphasis added.] (Feb 19)
TopWebmaster's Comments: Read the Greenwashing Index's explanation of greenwashing. Read Terrachoice's "Six Sins of Greenwashing."
19 February 2008 |
Webmaster's Comments: This Northeast Gateway LNG terminal, plus the Suez terminal off Gloucester, Massachusetts, and the Canaport terminal in Saint John, New Brunswick, will satisfy all of northern New England's natural gas requirements, according to LNG industry experts.